Newswise — Functional Family Therapy (FFT) is an intervention designed to address behavior problems in youth within the context of their family dynamics. While it has been widely implemented in 45 states across the U.S. and nine other high-income countries, a recent analysis of both published and unpublished studies reveals that FFT does not consistently demonstrate superior or inferior effectiveness compared to other treatments. These alternative treatments encompass various forms of individual, family, and group interventions. The findings emphasize the importance of continued research and critical evaluation of therapeutic approaches to ensure the most effective and tailored interventions for youth with behavior problems and their families.
In the analysis published in Campbell Systematic Reviews, the authors scrutinized 20 studies related to Family Functional Therapy. Interestingly, they highlighted that the current evidence is inadequate to draw firm conclusions regarding the therapy's effects when compared to no treatment. This underscores the need for further research and evidence-based studies to fully understand the impact and efficacy of Family Functional Therapy in addressing behavior problems in youth. More comprehensive investigations will be essential to inform clinical decision-making and better guide interventions for this vulnerable population.
In the context of Functional Family Therapy, Julia H. Littell, PhD, Professor Emerita of Bryn Mawr College, who serves as the corresponding author of the study, raised important concerns. While Functional Family Therapy is promoted and marketed as a "scientifically proven" or "evidence-based" program, the available evidence does not robustly support claims that FFT consistently outperforms other treatments. These findings indicate that there are serious doubts about the quality of the evidence backing FFT's efficacy. This highlights the necessity for further research and critical evaluation of therapeutic approaches to ensure transparency and accuracy in the claims made regarding the effectiveness of treatment programs for youth with behavior problems and their families.
Dr. Littell and her colleagues conducted a thorough examination of the most reliable studies and discovered that all of them were afflicted with substantial biases. "The results of at least three-quarters of these studies were not fully disclosed, and certain FFT studies did not release any of their findings to the public," she reported. "Moreover, the data available suggest that the results vary significantly within and across FFT studies." Dr. Littell also pointed out that the information regarding the cost effectiveness of FFT seemed to rely on exaggerated estimations of treatment effects, leading to doubts about the persuasiveness of claims made about FFT's cost effectiveness."
RSS